Blockchain-based Secure Healthcare for Cardio Disease Prediction of Arrhythmia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Heart disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. According to a recent study by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), roughly 25% of the deaths among people aged 252 to 69 are caused by various heart- related issues. The most common diseases are cardiovascular disorders. Due to a shortage of professionals and a significant number of incorrectly diagnosed cases, a quick and efficient detection method is required. So we should have always leaped on vigilance and care approaches and methods to avoid folks working extra due to the guts attack. Machine learning techniques are frequently used to make disease predictions. Blockchain technology has the ability to prevent data leaks and fraud. It has the potential to improve patient-hospital coordination . The suggested method improves data security while reducing the cost, time and resources needed to maintain a patient’s data and outcomes. Keywords: Blockchain, Healthcare, Machine Learning, Arrhythmia, Convolution Neural Network, Inter-Planetary File System.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".