A Multi-View Ensemble Width-Depth Neural Network for Short-Term Wind Power Forecasting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Short-term wind power forecasting (SWPF) is essential for managing wind power systems management. However, most existing forecasting methods fail to fully consider how to rationally integrate multi-view learning technologies with attention mechanisms. In this case, some potential features cannot be fully extracted, degenerating the predictive accuracy and robustness in SWPF. To solve this problem, this paper proposes a multi-view ensemble width-depth neural network (MVEW-DNN) for SWPF. Specifically, MVEW-DNN consists of local and global view learning subnetworks, which can effectively achieve more potential global and local view features of the original wind power data. In MVEW-DNN, the local view learning subnetwork is developed by introducing the deep belief network (DBN) model, which can efficiently extract the local view features. On the other hand, by introducing the attention mechanism, a new deep encoder board learning system (deBLS) is developed as the global view learning subnetwork, which provides more comprehensive global information. Therefore, by rationally learning the effective local and global view features, MVEW-DNN can achieve competitive predictive performance in SWPF. MVEW-DNN is compared with the state-of-the-art models in SWPF. The experiment results indicate that MVEW-DNN can provide competitive predictive accuracy and robustness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".