MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4281628579 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039474

Turbulent magnetic field in the H II region Sh 2–27

2022· article· en· W4281628579 on OpenAlexafffund
Nergis C. Raycheva, M. Haverkorn, Shinsuke Ideguchi, J. M. Stil, B. M. Gaensler, Xiaohui Sun, J. L. Han, E. Carretti, X. Y. Gao, T. Wijte

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversity of TorontoNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanada Research ChairsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean CommissionNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsMagnetic fieldFaraday effectSynchrotronPolarization (electrochemistry)AstrophysicsInterstellar mediumComputational physicsL-shellOpticsEarth's magnetic fieldGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. Magnetic fields in the turbulent interstellar medium (ISM) are a key element in understanding Galactic dynamics, but there are many observational challenges. One useful probe for studying the magnetic field component parallel to the line of sight (LoS) is Faraday rotation of linearly polarized radio synchrotron emission, combined with Hα observations. H ii regions are the perfect laboratories to probe such magnetic fields as they are localized in space, and are well-defined sources often with known distances and measurable electron densities. We chose the H ii region Sharpless 2–27 (Sh 2–27) as it is located at intermediate latitudes (b ~ 23°), meaning that it suffers from little LoS confusion from other sources. In addition, it has a large angular diameter (~10°), enabling us to study the properties of its magnetic field over a wide range of angular scales. Aims. By using a map of the magnetic field strength along the LoS (B‖)for the first time, we investigate the basic statistical properties of the turbulent magnetic field inside Sh 2–27. We study the scaling of the magnetic field fluctuations, compare it to the Kolmogorov scaling, and attempt to find an outer scale of the turbulent magnetic field fluctuations. Methods. We used the polarized radio synchrotron emission data from the S-band Polarization All-Sky Survey (S-PASS) at 2.3 GHz, which allowed us to test the impact of Sh 2–27 on diffuse Galactic synchrotron polarization. We estimated the rotation measure (RM) caused by the H ii region, using the synchrotron polarization angle. We used the Hα data from the Southern Hα Sky Survey Atlas to estimate the free electron density (ne) in the H ii region. Using an ellipsoid model for the shape of Sh 2–27, and with the observed RM and emission measure (EM), we estimated the LoS averaged B‖for each LoS within the ellipsoid. To characterize the turbulent magnetic field fluctuations, we computed a second-order structure function of B‖ We compared the structure function to Kolmogorov turbulence, and to simulations of Gaussian random fields processed in the same way as the observations. Results. We present the first continuous map of B‖ computed using the diffuse polarized radio emission in Sh 2–27. We estimate the median value of ne as 7.3 ± 0.1 cm−3, and the median value of B‖ as −4.5 ± 0.1 µG, which is comparable to the magnetic field strength in diffuse ISM. The slope of the structure function of the estimated B‖-map is found to be slightly steeper than Kolmogorov, consistent with our Gaussian-random-field B‖simulations revealing that an input Kolmogorov slope in the magnetic field results in a somewhat steeper slope in B‖.These results suggest that the lower limit to the outer scale of turbulence is 10 pc in the H ii region, which is comparable to the size of the computation domain. Conclusions. The structure functions of B‖ fluctuations in Sh 2–27 show that the magnetic field fluctuations in this H ii region are consistent with a Kolmogorov-like turbulence. Comparing the observed and simulated B‖ structure functions results in the estimation of a lower limit to the outer scale of the turbulent magnetic field fluctuations of 10 pc, which is limited by the size of the field of view under study. This may indicate that the turbulence probed here could actually be cascading from the larger scales in the ambient medium, associated with the interstellar turbulence in the general ISM, which is illuminated by the presence of Sh 2–27.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→