Bibliographic record
Abstract
Entre 1875 et 1890, Banville publia neuf volumes de contes, dont deux nouvelles éditions de ses nouvelles et contes recueillis avant 1871. Cet article se concentre sur le cadre conceptuel qui informait sa pratique du conte, en particulier ses idées sur la modernité, sa préférence avouée de courtiser un public féminin et le rôle qu’il joua dans Le Nouveau Décaméron comme doyen de la génération littéraire née entre 1820 et 1830. Mendès offrit une place d’honneur à Banville en le nommant roi des conteurs de la première journée. Il figure parmi les collaborateurs les plus fidèles en donnant dix contes. Nous analysons « Tiï », un conte peu commun et exotique, écrit spécialement pour la huitième journée sur « Les Amours lointaines ». L’étude des contes de Banville permet de démontrer que le conteur restait sensible aux questions de la vie sociale, en particulier de l’autonomie féminine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".