MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281629298 · doi:10.18290/rh21705.1

Théodore de Banville et Le Nouveau Décaméron

2022· article· fr· W4281629298 on OpenAlex
Peter J. Edwards

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRoczniki Humanistyczne · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsMount Allison University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Entre 1875 et 1890, Banville publia neuf volumes de contes, dont deux nouvelles éditions de ses nouvelles et contes recueillis avant 1871. Cet article se concentre sur le cadre conceptuel qui informait sa pratique du conte, en particulier ses idées sur la modernité, sa préférence avouée de courtiser un public féminin et le rôle qu’il joua dans Le Nouveau Décaméron comme doyen de la génération littéraire née entre 1820 et 1830. Mendès offrit une place d’honneur à Banville en le nommant roi des conteurs de la première journée. Il figure parmi les collaborateurs les plus fidèles en donnant dix contes. Nous analysons « Tiï », un conte peu commun et exotique, écrit spécialement pour la huitième journée sur « Les Amours lointaines ». L’étude des contes de Banville permet de démontrer que le conteur restait sensible aux questions de la vie sociale, en particulier de l’autonomie féminine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.828
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it