MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281632416 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noac079.212

GCT-18. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and tumor biopsy are not associated with relapse rate or patterns in primary central nervous system (CNS) germ cell tumor (GCT)

2022· article· en· W4281632416 on OpenAlexaff
Rachel Yan, Tong Lin, S. MacDonald, Joseph A. Carnevale, Aashim Bhatia, Dennis Shaw, Erin S. Murphy, Sarah Leary, Ute Bartels, Soumen Khatua, Maryam Fouladi, Amar Gajjar, Girish Dhall, Jason Fangusaro, Arzu Onar‐Thomas, Mark Souweidane

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminomaMedicineBiopsyInternal medicineSurgeryRadiologyChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND: ETV and tumor biopsy are central to the surgical management of children with primary CNS GCT. An ETV creates a communication between the intraventricular compartment and the subarachnoid spaces and decompartmentalizes the ventricular system. “Tumor spill” or shedding may result from surgical interventions, such as biopsy. ETV with simultaneous biopsy may impart a greater tendency for dissemination and possible distant relapse. This is a concern in CNS GCT given the attempts of irradiation field and dose reduction following chemotherapy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the prospective database for the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) ACNS1123 study. Possible associations were explored among ETV, endoscopic biopsy, and combined ETV+biopsy with relapse, distant relapse, progression free survival (PFS), and time to distant relapse. RESULTS: Among 244 eligible patients, 97 ETV+/-biopsies were performed, and 30 relapses occurred. There were no associations among ETV and/or biopsy with relapse (Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel [CMH] test, with histology (germinoma vs. nongerminomatous germ cell tumor (NGGCT)) as stratification variable: ETV: p=0.3167, biopsy: p=0.3375, combined: p=0.3066), distant relapse (CMH test, ETV: p=0.4631, ETV+biopsy: p=0.6795), PFS (log-rank test, ETV: NGGCT p=0.1632, germinoma p=0.9288; biopsy: NGGCT p=0.1682, germinoma p=0.9701; ETV+Biopsy: NGGCT p=0.1306, germinoma p=0.7758), or time to distant relapse with death/local relapse as competing risk (Gray’s test, ETV: NGGCT p=0.5694, germinoma p=0.2327; biopsy: NGGCT p=0.3505, germinoma p=0.5747; ETV+Biopsy: NGGCT p=0.3988, germinoma p=0.6839). CONCLUSIONS: Based on a secondary analysis of prospective data from the ACNS1123 trial, ETV and biopsy did not impart a greater likelihood of relapse in children with primary CNS GCT treated with combined chemotherapy and irradiation. However, three tract recurrences did occur (all germinoma), suggesting that they may affect pattern of relapse. Current and future prospective trials should continue to explore associations among these variables and relapse, including patterns of relapse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207