Aspectos da modernidade desigual e segregada: a política nas periferias de São Paulo
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A partir de uma abordagem teórica (Mouffe, 2015; Dardot y Laval, 2016; Souza, 2009) e etnográfica, com aplicação de pesquisa qualitativa, o presente texto propõe uma abordagem metodológica que possibilite a identificação de territórios de precariedade (periferias) na cidade de São Paulo e de seus moradores, com isso objetivando compreender a visão de mundo assim como as expectativas políticas desse morador das periferias. Esta análise pretende questionar a criminalização consensual que se instaura nos meios acadêmicos e midiáticos em relação às classes populares, que nas eleições de 2016 teriam rompido com uma tradição de voto nos partidos de esquerda, ao se identificarem massivamente com candidatos de perfil liberal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it