0266 Sleep Spindle-Duration: A Potential Biomarker for Neurodegenerative Disorder Phenotyping
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Decreased sleep spindle oscillations were previously associated with cognitive decline in older adults, increased tau levels, and phenoconversion to dementia in patients with Parkinson disease (PD). We analyzed quantitative sleep spindle measures to determine if this biomarker was associated with particular neurodegenerative disorder syndromes. Methods Sleep spindle oscillations ascertained in patients broadly characterized as presumed Parkinsonian-spectrum disorders (PSD), which included the subtypes dementia with Lewy Bodies/Parkinson Disease Dementia (DLB/PDD, n=16), PD (n=16), isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD, n=19), and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP, n=13), were compared with non-PSD subtypes Alzheimer Disease dementia (AD, n=22), mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n=35), and normal cognition (NC, n=61). Sleep Profiler studies were conducted in all participants. The automated spindle detection algorithms recognized temporal excursions in the alpha (8-12 Hz) and sigma (12-16 Hz) power of 250 milliseconds or greater, with spindle duration being the sum of all spindle elapsed times. Night-to-night variability was assessed in PSP=13, PD=16, DLB/PDD=12, AD=17, MCI=25, and NC=53. Statistical analyses included intraclass correlations (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots for two-night data, and Mann-Whitney U-tests and multiple logistic regression applied to sleep-time weight-averaged spindle-durations. Results The night-to-night spindle-duration ICC was 0.95 (P<0.0001), with a Bland-Altman bias of 0.05+/-2.83 minutes. Spindle-duration was independently associated with PSD versus non-PSD groups (P=0.017, OR 1.08, 95%-CI 1.01-1.15), but not significantly associated with age (P=0.12, OR 1.03, 95%-CI 0.99-1.07) or sex (P=0.54). When stratified by subtype, age was associated with spindle-duration when NC were compared to AD and MCI (P=0.0003, OR 1.10, 95%-CI 1.04-1.16) and when iRBD were compared to DLB/PDD, PD and PSP (P<0.05, OR 1.00, 95%-CI 0.89-1.13)Spindle-durations were reduced in PSP (0.9+/-2.1) and DLB/PDD (2.0+/-5.1) when individually compared to AD (3.2+/-7.1), iRBD (3.3+/-3.4), PD (5.3+/-6.6), MCI (5.3+/-9.7), and NC (8.0+/-11.1) subtypes (all P<0.05). AD patients also exhibited lower spindle-durations than NC (P=0.03). Conclusion Auto-detected sleep spindle-durations exhibited excellent night-to-night reliability in both NC and patients with neurologic disorders. Decreased sleep spindle-duration was independently associated with PSP and DLB/PDD, and in AD. Reduced sleep spindle duration may be a distinct sleep biomarker for those disorders likely indicating thalamocortical dysfunction. Support (If Any) NIA grants: R44AG050326, R44AG054256, P30AG62677 and R34AG56639.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".