MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281636902 · doi:10.3390/buildings12060788

A Novel Computational Approach for an Improved Expression of the Spectral Content in the Lower Atmospheric Boundary Layer

2022· article· en· W4281636902 on OpenAlexaff
Theodore Potsis, Ted Stathopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueBuildings · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerodynamicsWind tunnelTurbulencePlanetary boundary layerTerrainWind speedComputational fluid dynamicsBoundary layerLarge eddy simulationTurbulence kinetic energyLog wind profileFrequency domainSpectral methodWind directionWind gradientMeteorologyComputer scienceMechanicsPhysicsMathematicsGeographyMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents an innovative methodology for the simulation of incoming wind conditions in computational domains that use large eddy simulation (LES) for the evaluation of wind loads on low-rise buildings. Simulating the atmospheric boundary layer has proven to be a challenging process for computational wind engineering, especially to correctly introduce the fluctuations in the high-frequency spectral domain. Experiments in the Concordia University Building Aerodynamics Laboratory were carried out to estimate the evolution of turbulence features in the along-wind direction of a generic profile. Virtual probes were placed inside the computational domain to match the location of those in the wind tunnel and compare mean speed values, turbulence intensity, integral length scales, and spectral content. Synthetic methods were applied for the incoming wind velocity to estimate their capacity to capture the evolution of these turbulence features in the streamwise direction. The inability of these synthetic methods to represent the spectral domain, particularly for heights of interest for low-rise buildings, was examined, and the so-called dynamic terrain method in which velocity time histories are extracted from wind tunnel measurements and reconstructed to fit certain statistical parameters was implemented. The proposed method represents the frequency domain’s spectral content with good agreement with the theoretical von Karman spectrum and the experimental results. Advantages of the method include time efficiency and relative simplicity, which makes it attractive to the practitioners for the design of a neutral atmospheric boundary layer respecting the turbulent wind characteristics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBuildingsSame topicWind and Air Flow StudiesFrench-language works237,207