MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4281641699 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.7922

Podium Session 4: Pediatrics, Pelvic Pain, Sexual Dysfunction, Oncology

2022· article· en· W4281641699 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Editor CUAJ

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSession (web analytics)MedicinePelvic painPhysical therapyPediatric oncologyPediatricsInternal medicineSurgeryCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Concerns have been raised regarding the effectiveness and durability of transverse ventral corporotomies to reliably correct chordee.Herein, we assessed the outcomes of this technique to correct ventral curvature (VC) in severe penoscrotal hypospadias.Methods: We selected 62 patients who underwent both stages of primary staged inner prepuce graft repair with a minimum six-month followup from a prospectively collected hypospadias database (2008-2021, n=881).Proximal TIP/Byars flaps cases and redos were excluded.VC was corrected by dividing the urethral plate in all cases and performing three transverse ventral corporotomies ± dorsal plication (80%).Residual VC was checked in all cases during the second stage.All procedures were performed by a single surgeon.Preoperative testosterone stimulation (PTS) was administered for glans width <14 mm (three intramuscular injections, three weeks apart).Age at each stage of repair, meatal location, degree of VC assessed before/ after degloving with an artificial erection measured by photograph with an electronic app, anesthetic block (caudal/dorsal penile block), and complications (urethrocutaneous fistula [UCF], glans dehiscence [GD], recurrent VC, and graft contraction) were collected.Outcomes of interest were postoperative recurrent VC and overall complication rate.Recurrent VC was assessed by reflex erection during examination and/or parents reporting.Results: Median patient age at first and second stage was 21 and 30 months, respectively; mean followup was 42 months.Eighty-four percent of patients had penoscrotal 45 (72%), scrotal 9 (15%), and perineal hypospadias 12 (13%).Overall, 35/62 (57%) patients had VC between 30-70° and 27 (43%) had >70° after degloving; 57/62(92%) boys received PHS (three shots).Grafts took well in most cases, with only four (6%) contractions.Of these, two needed re-grafting and two were stretched (vit.E).The median interval between stages was eight months.Overall, complications occurred in 15/62(24%) boys: nine UCFs, five GDs, and one recurrent VC due to skin tethering.All successful cases had the neomeatus located at the tip of the glans.Parents of three boys with GD decided for no further surgery, leaving the meatus at the corona.In total, the re-operation rate was 19% (12/62).Conclusions: An overall re-operation rate of 19% was observed in patients who underwent staged preputial graft repair with three transverse corporotomies to treat scrotal/perineal hypospadias.This rate is significantly lower than what has been previously reported using staged Byars flaps procedures or single-stage operations.After a mean followup of almost four years, recurrent VC was seen in only one child (1.6%) due to skin tethering.Despite being the longest followup described with this technique thus far, we recognize that recurrent VC may not present until adolescence, therefore, following these patients until adulthood is imperative.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.201
Threshold uncertainty score0.671

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2010.050

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association Journal→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→