MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281643800 · doi:10.1364/josab.457046

Design and fabrication of a tapered fiber bundle for a pump combiner with a uniform splicing region

2022· article· en· W4281643800 on OpenAlexaff
Debparna Majumder, Sourav Das Chowdhury, Atasi Pal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Optical Society of America B · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic Crystal and Fiber Optics
Canadian institutionsCanadian Society of Intestinal Research
FundersMinistry of Electronics and Information technology
KeywordsMaterials scienceFabricationCladding (metalworking)BundleOpticsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A process of fabricating tapered fiber bundle (TFB) consisting of a set of input pump fibers, stacked inside a low-OH silica capillary, has been optimized to combine multiple multimode pump powers into different output fibers having cladding diameters of 400, 250, and 125 µm. Instead of individual input and output fiber processing, here pump combiner fabrication is based on the processing of the TFB to match its diameter with the output fiber to eliminate any perturbation in light guidance. Fabrication of the TFB includes multiple fusing steps and tapering with brightness conservation, followed by reduction of the outer silica layer through chemical etching to obtain the desired outer diameter. To reduce pump power leakage, the optimum fluorine cladding layer thickness outside the pump fiber cores and outer silica layer thickness have been estimated through numerical simulations using a finite element solver. The influence of fabrication parameters such as interstitial gaps between the input pump fibers, taper ratio, fluorine cladding, outer silica layer thickness, and non-uniformity of splicing region has been characterized in terms of transmission efficiency per port, as well as cumulative power handling along with the operating temperature at maximum power.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.287
Threshold uncertainty score0.192

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Optical Society of America BSame topicPhotonic Crystal and Fiber OpticsFrench-language works237,207