MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281646165

Les enceintes urbaines en Gaule. Défendre et définir la ville

2022· preprint· fr· W4281646165 on OpenAlexaff
Vivien Barrière

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval European History and Architecture
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dossier. Les enceintes urbaines en Gaule. Défendre et définir la ville De nombreuses villes de Gaule romaine se sont dotées de remparts afin d'assurer leur protection ou manifester leur puissance. S'il est difficile de les dater avec précision, les vestiges qui sont parvenus jusqu'à nous, souvent englobés dans des constructions plus récentes, permettent d'en savoir plus sur les conditions de leur réalisation. Archéologia vous propose un vaste panorama de ces majestueuses construction. Par Vivien Barrière, maître de conférences en histoire et archéologie, CY Cergy Paris Université, UMR 9022 HERITAGES

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicMedieval European History and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207