MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281648213 · doi:10.2337/db22-1198-p

1198-P: Prevention of COVID-with Subcutaneous Administration of CAS+IMD in Individuals with Diabetes and Other Risk Factors for Severe Disease

2022· article· en· W4281648213 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
MEAGAN O'BRIEN, EDUARDO FORLEO-NETO, ERNESTO OVIEDO ORTA, Jennifer McGinniss, PEIJIE HOU, FLONZA ISA, KUO-CHEN CHAN, Neena Sarkar, BRET J. MUSSER, Ruanne V. Barnabas, Myron S. Cohen, ADNAN MAHMOOD, GARY A. HERMAN, George D. Yancopoulos, David M. Weinreich

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePlaceboDiabetes mellitusInternal medicineClinical endpointBody mass indexRisk factorRelative riskRandomized controlled trialCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Clinical trialType 2 diabetesDiseaseConfidence intervalEndocrinologyPathologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Subcutaneous (SC) administration of the monoclonal antibody combination casirivimab and imdevimab (CAS+IMD) decreased the risk of COVID-in a phase 3 trial of uninfected adolescents/adults who shared a household with a SARS-CoV-2–infected individual (NCT04452318) . Here, we present a subgroup analysis of this study, assessing the efficacy and safety of CAS+IMD in preventing symptomatic COVID-in individuals with diabetes and other risk factors for progression to severe disease. Methods: Healthy individuals aged ≥12 years, identified within 96 hours of collection of a positive test from a household contact, were randomized 1:1 to receive SC CAS+IMD 1200 mg or placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants who developed symptomatic COVID-during the 28-day efficacy assessment period among those who were SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR negative at baseline. Post hoc analyses assessed efficacy and safety by diabetes history, body mass index (BMI) , and the presence/absence of ≥1 high-risk factor for severe COVID-19. Results: The efficacy analysis included 2067 participants who were enrolled from July 13, 2020–January 28, 2021 and were RT-qPCR negative at baseline. In participants with diabetes (n=139) , the relative risk reduction (RRR) of developing symptomatic COVID-with CAS+IMD vs. placebo was 76.3%. Similar results were observed in participants with BMI ≥30 kg/m2 (n=728; RRR=74.9%) and in those with ≥1 high-risk factor for severe COVID-at baseline (n=620; RRR=77.5%) . Across subgroups, injection-site reaction was more common with CAS+IMD versus placebo whereas asymptomatic COVID-19, COVID-19, and headache were more common with placebo versus CAS+IMD. Conclusions: In study participants with diabetes and those with other risk factors for severe COVID-19, treatment with SC CAS+IMD decreased the risk of developing symptomatic COVID-19, consistent with results in the overall population. Disclosure M.O'brien: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Other Relationship; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. R.V.Barnabas: Other Relationship; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. M.S.Cohen: Other Relationship; COVPN, Fogarty, HPTN, McGill, National Institutes of Health, Prime Global Options, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. A.Mahmood: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. G.A.Herman: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Other Relationship; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. G.D.Yancopoulos: Employee; Regenacy Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Other Relationship; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. D.M.Weinreich: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. The covid-phase 3 prevention trial team: n/a. E.Forleo-neto: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. E.Oviedo orta: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. J.Mcginniss: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. P.Hou: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. F.Isa: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Other Relationship; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. K.Chan: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. N.Sarkar: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. B.J.Musser: Employee; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. Funding Supported by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. This trial was conducted jointly with the COVID-Prevention Network, which was funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) , National Institutes of Health (NIH) .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207