MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SODA-Stream: SDN Optimization for Enhancing QoE in DASH Streaming

2022· article· en· W4281658344 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Hedayati Majdabadi, Mea Wang, Logan Rakai

Bibliographic record

VenueNOMS 2022-2022 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTPQuality of experienceDashBandwidth (computing)Computer networkVideo streamingThe InternetSoftware-defined networkingResource allocationMultimediaVideo qualityQuality of serviceMetric (unit)World Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Official statistics indicate that internet users all around the world watch more videos and play more games during the COVID-19 pandemic than at any time [18]. This unprecedented, challenging situation demands solutions to accommodate rapid growth while maintaining and/or enhancing the video quality. This paper proposes SODA-Stream, an SDN-based optimization framework for enhancing Quality-of-Experience (QoE) in DASH streaming. The optimization framework max-imizes the number of concurrent streaming sessions that can be accommodated in a network and maximize streaming quality. The practical implementation of the framework utilizes the dynamic routing and bandwidth allocation enabled by Software Defined Networking (SDN). The evaluation results show that SODA-Stream significantly outperforms the conventional network routing and resource allocation algorithms, accepting 52% more sessions, 45% improvement in bandwidth allocation, and 70% reduction in bandwidth wastage, smoother playback, and better viewing experience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNOMS 2022-2022 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management SymposiumSame topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207