“Nefsini/Kendini Tanıyan Rabbini de Tanır” Sözünün Tasavvuf ve ʻİlmü’t- Teşrîh (Anatomi İlmi) Zâviyelerinden Şerhi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The saying of “Man ʻarafa nafsah, fa-ḳad ʻarafa rabbah: He who knows himself, knows his Lord.” contains indications both to the body and the soul, since the human being’s self is formed as al-ḳālib/djism (body), and al-rūḥ (soul). This sentence is known from the ancient times in different styles. It is also referred frequently in Sufism, and even known as a Ḥadīth. This saying is important from the aspect of purification of the lower soul as well as from the aspect of the Science of Anatomy and unity of being. We can even say that in order to understand this saying, these three aspects should be considered together in a consequent form, and that is: Human being’s search for finding his Lord is bound to his practices of purification of his soul from bodily and worldly desires in a sufficient degree. When this is done, he will begin to see God even in his wordly body, since his body consists of extra-ordinary particulars, forms, organs and and their functions. After gaining this sight, he will also comprehend that his Lord is far from being known in His essence, since His essence is above all definitions and above limitations of human being’s intellect. He can only be known partly through his names and attributes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".