effectiveness of sex education on unconsummated marriage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to discuss the effects of training marital skills on unconsummated couples. The current study was conducted using ABA quasi-experimental plan with a single case. For this purpose, one couple with a purposive sampling method was selected and received Sex Education. Patients at the baseline (pretreatment) phase in third, sixth and eighth sessions as well as the 45-day follow-up phase, filled the researcher made questionnaires of the fear of vaginal intercourse, sexual satisfaction scale (ISS), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), International index of erectile function (IIEF) and McGill Pain Scale (Mc-gill-pain). For data analysis, two methods of Clinical significance and the percentage of improvement were used. Results showed that training marital skills were effective. Improvement percent for patients, who were receiving sexual treatment in 4 scales of the sexual function was 47%, sexual satisfaction was 64%, fear of vaginal penetration was 98% and pain was92%. Couples with pelvic pain disorders didn't receive adequate sexual skills training. When they received steps of sexual training, then they obtained the necessary health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".