MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281664721 · doi:10.5539/eer.v12n1p45

Long Term Electricity Load Forecast Based on Machine Learning for Cameroon’s Power System

2022· article· en· W4281664721 on OpenAlex
Terence K. Lukong, Derick Nganyu Tanyu, Thomas T. Tatietse, Detlef Schulz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy and Environment Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMean absolute percentage errorElectrical loadElectric power systemElectricityTerm (time)Recurrent neural networkParticle swarm optimizationPopulationTime horizonEconometricsArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkPower (physics)Machine learningMathematical optimizationMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A reliable power supply has long been identified as an important economic growth parameter. Electricity load forecasts predict the future behavior of the electricity load. Carrying out a forecast is important for real-time dispatching of power, grid maintenance scheduling, grid expansion planning, and generation planning depending on the forecasting horizon. Most of the methods used in long-term load forecasting are regressions and are limited to predicting peak loads of a yearly or monthly resolution with low accuracy. In this paper, we propose a method based on long short-term memory-recurrent neural networks (LSTM-RNN) cells with relations between identified influential econometric load-driving parameters which includes: the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), Population (H), and past Electric Load Data. To the best of our knowledge, the use of the GDP and H as two additional independent variables in load forecast modelling using machine learning techniques is a novelty in Cameroon. A comparison was performed between a linear regression (LR)-based long-term load forecast model (a model currently used by the Transmission System Operator of Cameroon) and LSTM-RNNs model constructed. The results generated were evaluated using a Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) within the same period of evaluation, and the overall value of the MAPE obtained for LSTM-RNNs model was 5.4962 whereas that for the LR model was 7.5422. Based on these results, the LSTM-RNN model is considered highly accurate and competent. The model was used to generate a forecast for the period of 2022–2026 with an hourly resolution. A MAPE of 5.4962 was obtained with a computational time of approximately ten minutes, making the model vital for offline use by utilities due to its capacity to quantitatively and accurately predict long-term load with an hourly resolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.717

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it