Resource allocation for IRS‐assisted MC MISO‐NOMA system
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, a downlink multi‐user communication of an intelligent reflecting surface (IRS)‐assisted multiple‐input single‐output (MISO) power‐domain non‐orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) system is investigated. Considering multi‐carrier (MC) transmission and to enhance user fairness, two users are assigned to the same subcarrier. For such a system, the authors optimize active beamforming at the base station (BS), subcarrier allocation policy, and phase shifts at the IRS to maximize the system throughput. A semi‐definite relaxation (SDR) is applied to tackle the non‐convex optimization problem, and an alternating optimization (AO) algorithm is proposed to obtain a suboptimal solution. Numerical results illustrate the higher throughput of the proposed MC multi‐user IRS‐aided MISO‐NOMA system as compared to the conventional IRS‐assisted orthogonal multiple access (OMA) system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it