MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281672108 · doi:10.1155/2022/5033601

Research on Direct Braking Force Estimation and Control Strategy Using Tire Inverse Model

2022· article· en· W4281672108 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhiguo Zhou, Xiaoning Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnti-lock braking systemEngine brakingThreshold brakingAutomotive engineeringControl theory (sociology)Braking distanceElectronic brakeforce distributionEngineeringSlip (aerodynamics)InverseComputer scienceBraking systemBrakeControl (management)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the rapid development of computer control and vehicle intelligence technology, speed and safety of vehicles have been greatly improved, and the requirements for vehicle control performance are getting higher and higher. For the direct braking force control, in the process of deceleration, a fast braking response can be obtained, which improves the braking performance and vehicle safety. This paper concentrates on direct braking force estimation and control strategy using a tire inverse model based on the antilock braking system, and to solve the problem of the existing ABS system is mainly antilock braking function, no direct braking force control function. Taking magic formula model for reference inverse model, the critical parameters under different road surfaces are obtained according to experience data. Then, the desired slip ratio corresponding to braking force can be obtained via fast tire inverse model look-up table method. The tyre friction self-adjustment decision making is obtained using the tire inverse model method. A direct braking force antilock braking system (DBF-ABS) controller is built using the nonsingular fast terminal sliding mode method. The simulation results indicated that the control strategy has adaptability and stability to the change of road conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicVehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207