MetaSSD: Meta-Learned Self-Supervised Detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep learning-based symbol detector gains increasing attention due to the simple algorithm design than the traditional model-based algorithms such as Viterbi and BCJR. The supervised learning framework is often employed to train a model, where true symbols are necessary. There are two major limitations in the supervised approaches: a) a model needs to be retrained from scratch when new train symbols come to adapt to a new channel status, and b) the length of the training symbols needs to be longer than a certain threshold to make the model generalize well on unseen symbols. To overcome these challenges, we propose a meta-learning-based self-supervised symbol detector named MetaSSD. Our contribution is two-fold: a) meta-learning helps the model adapt to a new channel environment based on experience with various meta-training environments, and b) self-supervised learning helps the model to use relatively less supervision than the previously suggested learning-based detectors. In experiments, MetaSSD outperforms OFDM-MMSE with noisy channel information and shows comparable results with BCJR. Further ablation studies show the necessity of each component in our framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".