CARSP: A Smart Parking System Based on Doubly Periodic Rolling Horizon Allocation Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Blind search for available parking space is accountable for most traffic congestion, accident, and pollution in cities, which severely impact people’s life. Parking management based on an online smart parking system is practical to alleviate parking problems in which parking allocation is the core. However, existing researches are weak at satisfying allocation effect and speed simultaneously when solving large-scale dynamic parking allocation problem. To address this problem, we firstly construct an online “Collection-Allocation-Response” smart parking system (CARSP) to offer parking services to users and rent parking spaces from owners so as to obtain revenue for system managers. We then propose a novel Doubly Periodic Rolling Horizon allocation approach (DPRH) that circularly conduct allocation within a short period and reallocation within a long period. We formulate a narrow allocation model (without reallocation) and broad allocation model (with reallocation), both of which are binary integer programming models with the objective of maximizing system integrated benefit. We design seven performance metrics to evaluate the overall allocation effect and speed of CARSP based on DPRH. According to the three-day district-level instance in Beijing, CARSP based on DPRH performs excellently in balancing allocation effect and speed. This study is meaningful for constructing and optimizing an online smart parking system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it