MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

High-Throughput Synthesis of Thin Films for the Discovery of Energy Materials: A Perspective

2022· review· en· W4281688171 on OpenAlexafffund
Shahram Moradi, Soumya Kundu, Makhsud I. Saidaminov

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Materials Au · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsThin filmMaterials scienceFabricationNanotechnologyCharacterization (materials science)ThroughputThermoelectric materialsPerspective (graphical)Engineering physicsOptoelectronicsComputer scienceTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thin films are an integral part of many electronic and optoelectronic devices. They also provide an excellent platform for material characterization. Therefore, strategies for the fabrication of thin films are constantly developed and have significantly benefited from the advent of high-throughput synthesis (HTS) platforms. This perspective summarizes recent advances in HTS of thin films from experimentalists' point of view. The work analyzes general strategies of HTS and then discusses their use in developing new energy materials for applications that rely on thin films, such as solar cells, light-emitting diodes, batteries, superconductors, and thermoelectrics. The perspective also summarizes some key challenges and opportunities in the HTS of thin films.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Materials AuSame topicElectronic and Structural Properties of OxidesFrench-language works237,207