MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281693523 · doi:10.1522/revueot.v31n1.1457

Caroline Dufresne, Conseillère en transfert pour Territoires innovants en économie sociale et solidaire (TIESS)

2022· article· fr· W4281693523 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
France Desjardins, Jeanne Simard

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Organisations & territoires · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conseillère en transfert pour Territoires innovants en économie sociale et solidaire (TIESS)Caroline Dufresne a obtenu en 2013 une maîtrise en développement régional de l'Université du Québec à Chicoutimi.Depuis 2016, elle travaille comme conseillère en transfert pour Territoires innovants en économie sociale et solidaire (TIESS), une organisation à but non lucratif qui a pour mission de contribuer au développement territorial par le transfert de connaissances en outillant les organismes d'économie sociale et solidaire afin qu'ils puissent faire face aux enjeux de société de façon innovante et transformer leurs pratiques.L'organisme a trois mandats : 1) la liaison, qui permet de développer et de renforcer des liens entre l'ensemble des acteurs concernés par l'innovation sociale, spécifiquement en économie sociale et solidaire; 2) la veille, qui vise à répertorier et à identifier des expériences porteuses; et 3) le transfert de connaissances entre des chercheurs et des praticiens de l'économie sociale et du développement territorial. Madame Dufresne, merci de nous accueillir dans vos bureaux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue Organisations & territoiresSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207