Anomaly Detection and Localization in NFV Systems: an Unsupervised Learning Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the scarcity of labeled faulty data, Unsupervised Learning (UL) methods have gained great traction for anomaly detection and localization in Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) systems. In a UL approach, training is performed on only normal data for learning normal data patterns, and deviation from the norm is considered as an anomaly. However, it has been shown that even small percentages of anomalous samples in the training data (referred to as contamination) can significantly degrade the performance of UL methods. To address this issue, we propose an anomaly-detection approach based on the Noisy-Student technique, which was originally introduced for leveraging unlabeled datasets in computer-vision classification problems. Our approach not only provides robustness against training-data contamination, but also can leverage this contamination to improve anomaly-detection accuracy. Moreover, after an anomaly is detected, localization of the anomalous virtualized network functions in an unsupervised manner is a challenging task in the absence of labeled data. For anomaly localization in NFV systems, we propose to exploit existing local AI-explainability methods to achieve a high localization performance and propose our own novel AI-explainability method, specifically designed for the anomaly-localization problem in NFV, to improve the performance further. We perform a comprehensive experimental analysis on two datasets collected on different NFV testbeds and show that our proposed solutions outperform the existing methods by up to 22% in anomaly detection and up to 19% in anomaly localization in terms of F1-score.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".