MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Numerical Study using RANS model to Predict Loading of a Wind Turbine Blade with a Trailing Edge Flap

2022· article· en· W4281701383 on OpenAlexaff
R Jami, Farid Samara, David A. Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Energy Research and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAirfoilTrailing edgeAngle of attackPitching momentLift coefficientAerodynamic centerComputational fluid dynamicsMechanicsWind tunnelChord (peer-to-peer)Stall (fluid mechanics)Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equationsLift (data mining)TurbineReynolds numberTurbine bladeWingStructural engineeringPhysicsAerodynamicsEngineeringAerospace engineeringComputer scienceTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A numerical study was conducted with a 3D steady state Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model using k-ω SST at SATP conditions for air. The mesh geometry is based on a S833 airfoil with a trailing edge flap to predict the lift and moment loads. This airfoil is representative of a wind turbine blade. A set of static CFD simulation cases were conducted with a free stream velocity of 29 m/s at an angle of attack (α) between -4° and 20°. A trailing edge flap is also present on the airfoil which was operated between an angle (αf) of -20° and 20°. The airfoil has a chord of 178 mm with the trailing edge flap covering 20% of the length and chord-based Reynolds number of 350,000. The CFD results were compared against an experimental study performed in a closed-loop wind tunnel at the University of Waterloo. The wind tunnel has a contraction ratio of 9:1 and a cross section of 0.61 m square. The experimental data showed that lift forces increased at a larger angle of attack and larger downward flap angle up until stall. Moment on the blade is relatively constant regardless of the angle of attack, however, increases significantly with upward flap angle. The CFD results showed very similar results in both the lift and moment coefficient, with all angle configurations having over 90% agreeability excluding α near +/- 20°.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicWind Energy Research and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207