MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281708199 · doi:10.52975/llt.2022v89.0011

What’s New about Social Reproduction?

2022· article· en· W4281708199 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Susan Braedley, Tara McWhinney

Bibliographic record

VenueLabour / Le Travail · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReproductionBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The covid-19 pandemic has disrupted not only capitalism's production and distribution mechanisms but the reproduction of life from day to day. In 2020, as nursing home deaths mounted, hospitals were swamped by patients, schools and daycares emptied, grocery store shelves were depleted, and home deliveries by some allowed others to stay safely at home, many workers were stretched to the breaking point by the double burden of caring for children at home and working in essential services. For other employed people -who depend on daycare workers, home care workers, teachers, cleaners, and commercial food workers to do some of the work necessary to maintain their household members -the shift to doing without these workers and doing the work themselves was incredibly difficult. Disproportionate infection, death, economic hardship, and state violence continue to devastate Black, Indigenous, newcomer, and low-income communities, and women have been particularly hard hit. So-called frontline workers -a group that overwhelmingly consists review essay / note critique

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score0.912

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLabour / Le TravailSame topicReproductive Health and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207