MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281711797 · doi:10.7554/elife.64742

Distinct but overlapping roles of LRRTM1 and LRRTM2 in developing and mature hippocampal circuits

2022· article· en· W4281711797 on OpenAlexafffund
Shreya H. Dhume, Steven A. Connor, Fergil Mills, Parisa Karimi Tari, Sarah HM Au-Yeung, Benjamin Karimi, Shinichiro Oku, Reiko T. Roppongi, Hiroshi Kawabe, Shernaz X. Bamji, Yu Tian Wang, Nils Brose, Michael Jackson, Ann Marie Craig, Tabrez J. Siddiqui

Bibliographic record

VenueeLife · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of British ColumbiaHealth Sciences Centre
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceCanada Research ChairsHeart and Stroke Foundation of British Columbia and YukonResearch ManitobaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUehara Memorial FoundationOhsumi Frontier Science FoundationTakeda Science Foundation
KeywordsDentate gyrusNeuroscienceHippocampal formationLong-term potentiationBiologyExcitatory postsynaptic potentialSynapsePostsynaptic potentialHippocampusSynaptic plasticityBiological neural networkNeuronal circuitsInhibitory postsynaptic potentialGeneticsReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LRRTMs are postsynaptic cell adhesion proteins that have region-restricted expression in the brain. To determine their role in the molecular organization of synapses in vivo, we studied synapse development and plasticity in hippocampal neuronal circuits in mice lacking both Lrrtm1 and Lrrtm2 . We found that LRRTM1 and LRRTM2 regulate the density and morphological integrity of excitatory synapses on CA1 pyramidal neurons in the developing brain but are not essential for these roles in the mature circuit. Further, they are required for long-term-potentiation in the CA3-CA1 pathway and the dentate gyrus, and for enduring fear memory in both the developing and mature brain. Our data show that LRRTM1 and LRRTM2 regulate synapse development and function in a cell-type and developmental-stage-specific manner, and thereby contribute to the fine-tuning of hippocampal circuit connectivity and plasticity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.221
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeLifeSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207