Predissociation spectroscopy of cold CN<sup>−</sup>H<sub>2</sub> and CN<sup>−</sup>D<sub>2</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The vibrational predissociation spectra of the CN–H2 and CN–D2 complexes are measured in regions between 450 and 3100 cm−1 in an ion trap at different temperatures at the free electron lasers for infrared experiments (FELIX) Laboratory. Strong differences between the vibrational spectra of the two para and ortho nuclear spin isomers (CN–(p-H2) or CN–(o-H2) and CN–(p-D2) or CN–(o-D2)) are detected. In the case of CN–H2 we could assign the observed bands with the help of an accurate quantum calculation. The spectrum is dominated by the first overtone of the hindered H2 rotation in combination with the hindered CN rotation of the CN–(o-H2) nuclear spin isomer. The energetically higher-lying CN–(p-H2) isomer was not observed due to efficient ortho-para ligand exchange. The C–N stretching mode was recorded at 2040(1) cm−1. For the CN–D2 system several vibrational modes of both spin isomers overlap in their low-lying intermonomer streching and bending region, but the main observed bands are attributed to the more stable CN–(p-D2) spin isomer. The D–D stretching vibration was found to be at 2898(1) cm−1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".