394-P: Baseline Risk Markers and Visit-to-Visit Variability in Relation to Kidney Outcomes: A Post Hoc Analysis of the PERL Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Baseline risk variables and visit-to-visit variability (VV) of systolic blood pressure (SBP) , HbA1c, serum creatinine, and uric acid (UA) are potential risk markers of kidney function decline in type 1 diabetes. Methods: Post-hoc analysis of the PERL study (NCT02017171) - a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating allopurinol’s effect on iohexol-derived glomerular filtration rate (iGFR) in type 1 diabetes with elevated UA. Primary outcome was iGFR change over three years. Linear regression with backwards selection of baseline clinical variables was performed to identify an optimized model forecasting iGFR change. VV of SBP, HbA1c, serum creatinine, and UA were calculated as standard deviations of the residuals in individual linear regression models (LV) and coefficients of variation (CV) using all available measurements in the run-in period; thereafter assessed by linear regression, with iGFR change as the dependent variable. Adjustment included sex, baseline age, diabetes duration, BMI, HbA1c, SBP, kidney function (iGFR or eGFR, as appropriate) , urine albumin excretion rate (UAER) , smoking, and renin-angiotensin system inhibitor use. Results: 422 participants completed the trial, 4were included in this analysis. In the optimized baseline risk marker model, race other (including but not limited to Hawaiian/Pacific Islander) than White, Black, or Asian, higher HbA1c, UAER, and heart rate, and lower iGFR were associated with faster iGFR decline; Hispanic/Latino ethnicity was not. Assessing VV, higher LV and CV of SBP was associated with faster iGFR decline (adjusted LV β: -0.79, p=0.01; CV β: -0.79, p=0.04) ; VVs of HbA1c, creatinine, and UA were not. Conclusions: We identified several risk markers of faster iGFR decline in a high-risk population of individuals with type 1 diabetes. In addition to previously described associations, higher SBP VV was a risk marker for faster kidney function decline. Disclosure V.Rotbain curovic: None. S.Polsky: Advisory Panel; Medtronic, Other Relationship; diaTribe, Research Support; Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, Medtronic, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Sanofi-Aventis U.S. R.Pop-busui: Advisory Panel; Averitas Pharma, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Nevro Corp., Novo Nordisk, Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Regenacy Pharmaceuticals, Inc. R.J.Sigal: Advisory Panel; Novo Nordisk Canada Inc., Research Support; Novo Nordisk Canada Inc. K.R.Tuttle: Advisory Panel; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Consultant; AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, Research Support; Bayer AG, Goldfinch Bio, Inc., Novo Nordisk, Travere. G.E.Umpierrez: Research Support; AstraZeneca, Dexcom, Inc., Novo Nordisk. A.Wallia: Advisory Panel; Eli Lilly and Company, Research Support; Novo Nordisk, UnitedHealth Group. S.Rosas: Advisory Panel; AstraZeneca, Teladoc Health, Other Relationship; Bayer AG, Research Support; AstraZeneca, Bayer AG. P.Rossing: Consultant; Astellas Pharma Inc., AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Speaker's Bureau; Eli Lilly and Company. The perl study group: n/a. N.Roy: None. T.W.Hansen: Stock/Shareholder; Novo Nordisk A/S. L.Caramori: Advisory Panel; Bayer AG, Consultant; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk, Research Support; Bayer AG, Novartis AG. D.Cherney: Other Relationship; AbbVie Inc., AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Lilly, Maze, BMS, CSL-Behring, Merck, Otsuka, Novartis and Novo-Nordisk , Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Sanofi, Research Support; Boehringer Ingelheim-Lilly, Merck, Janssen, Sanofi, AstraZeneca and Novo-Nordisk. I.De boer: Advisory Panel; AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Cyclerion Therapeutics, Inc., George Clinical, Goldfinch Bio, Inc., Other Relationship; American Society of Nephrology, Research Support; Dexcom, Inc. I.B.Hirsch: Consultant; Abbott Diabetes, Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc., GWave, Roche Diabetes Care, Research Support; Beta Bionics, Inc., Insulet Corporation, Medtronic. I.Lingvay: Advisory Panel; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Lilly, Mannkind, TARGET PharmaSolutions; Valeritas;; Altimmune; DataRevive; Click; Medscape Duke CRI; Janssen Pharma; Bayer; Intercept, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Zealand Pharma A/S, Consultant; Novo Nordisk, Research Support; NovoNordisk; Mylan; Merck, Sanofi. J.B.Mcgill: Advisory Panel; Gilead Sciences, Inc., Lilly Diabetes, MannKind Corporation, Novo Nordisk A/S, Provention Bio, Inc., Salix Pharmaceuticals, Consultant; Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Research Support; Dexcom, Inc., Novo Nordisk. Funding Supported by grants from the NIDDK (R03-DK-094484, R34-DK-097808, UC4-DK-101108, P30-DK-036836, and P30-DK-020572) , the JDRF (17-2012-377) , the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1-TR-002494, UL1-TR- 001422, UL1-TR-002556, UL1-TR-002319, and UL1-TR- 001105) , and the National Institute on Aging (Claude Pepper Center grant number, P30-AG-024824)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".