In Silico Identification of Potential Inhibitors of the SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Through Molecular Docking-Based Drug Repurposing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 is the virus responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic, and its effects on people worldwide continue to grow. Protein-targeted therapeutics are currently unavailable for this virus. As with other coronaviruses, the nucleocapsid (N) protein is the most conserved RNA-binding structural protein of SARS-CoV-2. The N protein is an appealing target because of its functional role in viral transcription and replication. Therefore, molecular docking method for structure-based drug design was used to investigate the binding energy and binding modes of various anti-N inhibitors in depth. The inhibitors selected were originally developed to target stress granules and other molecules involved in RNA biology, and were either FDA-approved or in the process of clinical trials for COVID-19. We aimed at targeting the N-terminal RNA binding domain (NTD) for molecular docking-based screening, on the basis of the first resolved crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 N protein (PDB ID: 6M3M) and C-terminal domain (CTD) dimerization of the nucleocapsid phosphoprotein of SARS-COV-2 (PDB ID: 6WJI). Silmitasertib, nintedanib, ternatin, luteolin, and fedratinib were found to interact with RNA binding sites and to form a predicted protein interface with high binding energy. Similarly, silmitasertib, sirolimus-rapamycin, dovitinib, nintedanib, and fedratinib were found to interact with the SARS-CoV-2 N protein at its CTD dimerization sites, according to previous studies. In addition, we investigated an information gap regarding the relationships among the energetic landscape and stability and drug binding of the SARS-CoV-2 N NTD and CTD. Our in silico results clearly indicated that several tested drugs as potent putative inhibitors for COVID-19 therapeutics, thus indicating that they should be further validated as treatments to slow the spread of SARS-CoV-2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".