THE IMPORTANCE OF SEASONAL TEXTURAL FEATURES FOR OBJECT-BASED CLASSIFICATION OF WETLANDS: NEW YORK STATE CASE STUDY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Seasonal variations result in hydrophytes and undrained hydric soil changes in wetland areas, which lead to a dynamic environment that makes wetland classification challenging. This study aims to explore the applicability of multi-seasonal Gray-Level Co-Occurrence Matrix (GLCM) texture-derived features for object-based wetland classification over large-extent for the first time. We attempted to enhance the performance of the random forest classifier by incorporating multi-source remote sensing data, including Sentinel-2, Sentinel-1, Alos-Palsar, and topographic features. A total of 47 features were extracted from multi-source remote sensing data. In this context, we assessed the applicability of multi- versus mono-seasonal derived features for the wetland's classes with low within-class separability. We investigated the mean decrease in the Gini impurity index for each GLCM feature. We observed that including GLCM features enhanced overall accuracy by 7.38% when using imagery from one season and 4.21% for multi-season imagery. The multi-season scenario that included GLCM measures (93.49%) attained the highest overall accuracy. For this scenario, the means of decrease in Gini impurity index suggested that Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index, Modified Normalized Difference Water Index, slope, correlation in summer (GLCM feature), and Sentinel-1 VH are the most important features in increasing the random forest's classifier performance. In looking at the GLCM features, the separability analysis suggested that Entropy, Sum of Average, and Variance calculated from the summer imagery improve the classifier's performance while other textural features from spring imagery better contributed to classifier accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".