MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281717022 · doi:10.1163/22116001-03601015

Geopolitics and Shipping Development in the Arctic

2022· article· en· W4281717022 on OpenAlex
Frédèric Lasserre, Alexandra Cyr

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueOcean Yearbook Online · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRivalryGeopoliticsThe arcticArcticTheme (computing)Climate changePolitical scienceOceanographyGeographyEconomyMeteorologyHistoryGeologyLawEconomicsPoliticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the impact of climate change and the melting of sea ice, many narratives about the impending boom in Arctic transit shipping have emerged. Analyses also highlight the potential conflicts between Russia and Canada, on the one hand, claiming sovereignty over their respective Arctic passage, and the United States, the European Union and possibly Asian States, on the other hand, asserting to various degrees the international straits status for these Arctic passages. These geopolitical conflicts for the control of transit shipping and the Arctic straits have not taken place because of a very limited traffic volume stemming for the limited attraction of these Arctic routes for transit. Traffic is indeed expanding, but it is destinational traffic, under the firm control of the port State. The possible development of transshipment hubs for Arctic shipping could change this picture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.633

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it