MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281718145 · doi:10.1089/pmr.2021.0059

Extending Palliative Approaches to Care Beyond the Mainstream Health Care System: An Evaluation of a Small Mobile Palliative Care Team in Calgary, Alberta, Canada

2022· article· en· W4281718145 on OpenAlexaffabout
Courtney R. Petruik, Simon Colgan

Bibliographic record

VenuePalliative Medicine Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory ServicesUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPalliative careReferralNursingSocial workMedicineCLARITYHealth careMainstreamFocus groupEnd-of-life careFamily medicineBusinessPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: People experiencing houselessness (PH) endure worse health outcomes than their housed counterparts and often have inadequate care when nearing end of life. Innovative palliative care approaches are necessary when considering socially vulnerable populations. Aim: Evaluate the implementation and early outcomes of the Calgary Allied Mobile Palliative Program (CAMPP) after the first four years of servicing people experiencing extreme social marginality. Setting/Participants: Participants include CAMPP clients and service providers (SPs) who work adjacently to CAMPP in the social services/health sectors. Design: This is a mixed-methods evaluation, including an SP survey ( n = 31); client interviews ( n = 5); collection of program metrics; and case note reviews. Results: The CAMPP has served 128 clients to date. The CAMPP supported clients by connecting them to 62 services, programs, agencies, and/or resources totaling 485 connections. The most referred-to resource was for social support in the community for PH at 61 referrals. The second was for transportation with 57 referrals, followed by referrals to palliative and Home Care programs ( n = 53 referrals). Another common referral was for food assistance with 30 referrals. The survey showed that 97% of SPs agreed that CAMPP is “an essential service in the area of palliative care.” Twenty-six of 30 (87%) “Strongly Agreed” or “Agreed” that their knowledge in working with people with life-limiting illnesses has improved since working with CAMPP. The SPs suggested that the team should focus on referral clarity and improved communication with the wider health care team. Finally, clients reported high levels of satisfaction with CAMPP services. Clients also reported challenges navigating the complexity of care in the social/health services sector. Conclusions: The CAMPP bridges the gap in care between health/social services. The CAMPP connects clients to community resources and is effective in adapting to client needs. This evaluation provides four recommendations to improve and build on the existing program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.382
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.180
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalliative Medicine ReportsSame topicPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesFrench-language works237,207