MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281720075 · doi:10.24297/ijct.v22i.9228

Hyalite Sol-Gel Amoeba: A Physiology-Based Biophysical Model for Segmentation and Biotransformation of Medical Images To 3D Solid-State Characterizing Native Tissue Properties for Patient-Specific and Patient-Appropriate Analysis for Surgical Applications

2022· article· en· W4281720075 on OpenAlexaff
Harjeet Singh Gandhi

Bibliographic record

VenueINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS & TECHNOLOGY · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpaceflight effects on biology
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmoeba (genus)Amoeba proteusSegmentationComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceBiologyCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The endeavour to improve medical image segmentation techniques for higher analysis in surgical planning and medical therapeutics is far from becoming a standard of care in clinical practice. Hyalite Sol-Gel Amoeba model based on biophysical sciences apart from performing image segmentation is designed to extract real-world tissue densities for patient-specific and patient-appropriate analysis. Objectives: Amoeba Proteus is a unicellular independent entity, with a nucleus and sol-gel protoplasm enclosed in a membrane. The study presents versatile restructuring anatomy and physiology of the Amoeba Proteus for segmentation of 2D, and 3D medical images based on well-established principles of energy minimization and active contour. It demonstrates how the animalcule glides and advances by throwing pseudopodia driven by phenomenal actin-myosin activity that can segment a region-of-interest, and finally, at the time of apoptosis, its protoplasm and organelles acquire distribution of original image intensities to characterize tissue densities. Methods: This seminal study following a brief review of computer vision science discusses the relationship between optical density and tissue density, and the theory of sol-gel fluid mechanics. The framework of the HSG-Amoeba is described with the segmentation of various skeletal components of the thoracic cage. Results: This being a foundational study to describe the concept of the HSG-Amoeba model it requires the development of a mathematical algorithm to demonstrate its worthiness as a tool for surgical applications. Conclusion: The focus of the study is to present the design and framework of the newly conceived HSG-Amoeba model to segment a medical image and extract tissue densities without altering the original image intensities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS & TECHNOLOGYSame topicSpaceflight effects on biologyFrench-language works237,207