Beyond-Cell Communications via HAPS-RIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ever-increasing number of users and new services in urban regions can lead terrestrial base stations (BSs) to become overloaded and, consequently, some users to go unserved. Compounding this, users in urban areas can face severe shadowing and blockages, which means that some users do not receive a desired quality of service (QoS). Motivated by the energy and cost benefits of reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) and the advantages of high altitude platform stations (HAPS), including their wide footprint and strong line-of-sight (LoS) links, we propose a solution to service the stranded users using the RISaided HAPS. More specifically, we propose to service the stranded users by a dedicated control station (CS) via a HAPS equipped with RIS (HAPS-RIS). Through this approach, users are not restricted from being serviced by the cell they belong to; hence, we refer to this approach as beyond-cell communication. As we demonstrate in this paper, beyond-cell communication works in tandem with legacy terrestrial networks to support uncovered or unserved users. Optimal transmit power and RIS unit assignment strategies for the users based on different network objectives are introduced. Numerical results demonstrate the benefits of the proposed beyond-cell communication approach. Moreover, the results provide insights into the different optimization objectives and their interplay with minimum quality-of-service (QoS) and network resources, such as transmit power and the number of reflectors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".