MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281725081 · doi:10.21091/mppa.2022.2015

Clinical Burden of Injuries in Students at a Professional Circus College: A 7.5-Year Longitudinal Study

2022· article· en· W4281725081 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Problems of Performing Artists · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusicians’ Health and Performance
Canadian institutionsCentre de Santé et de Services Sociaux Cavendish
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncidence (geometry)MedicinePhysical therapyInjury preventionRehabilitationPoison controlEmergency medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To characterize clinical burden of injuries incurred by circus students enrolled in a 3-year college training program. METHODS: Student (n=334) injury data derived from an in situ clinic was examined over a 7.5-year time frame from August 2009 to December 2016. Injury incidence rate (per 1,000 training hours) was calculated and clinical incidence (injuries/year) was examined in relation to year in program, sex, age, and circus discipline. Weekly and monthly injury incidence were plotted with respect to milestones in the scholastic training year. Clinical burden (injury incidence and duration) was examined according to anatomic location and circus discipline. RESULTS: The overall injury incidence rate was 1.89 injuries/1,000 training hours and 0.94 injuries/1,000 training hours for injuries with a duration longer than 4 weeks. Clinical incidence decreased with year in program (p<0.05) and there were no sex or age differences. Temporal analysis demonstrated elevated weekly injury incidence for the 3 weeks following return from both summer and winter vacation (p<0.01) and for the weeks leading up to technical exams (p<0.01). According to anatomical location, shoulder injuries accounted for the greatest clinic burden followed by ankles and according to discipline, ground acrobat flyers followed by ground acrobats with equipment accounted for the greatest clinic burden. CONCLUSION: Overall injury incidence rate in the circus training program was within the range reported by other circus training programs and similar artistic and athletic training programs. Resources should be designated for enhanced rehabilitation efficacy and prevention of shoulder and ankle injuries and for ground acrobats with equipment and flyers. Preventative strategies to improve safety upon return-to-training after vacations should be examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it