MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281725835 · doi:10.5539/nct.v7n1p12

Power Management of Base Transceiver Stations for Mobile Networks

2022· article· en· W4281725835 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Giuseppe Iazeolla

Bibliographic record

VenueNetwork and Communication Technologies · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversità degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata
KeywordsBase transceiver stationBase stationComputer networkWirelessTransceiverComputer scienceUser equipmentWireless networkTelecommunicationsQuality of serviceWattPower managementTransmission (telecommunications)Cellular networkEngineeringPower (physics)Wi-Fi array

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Base Transceiver Station (BTS) is a piece of equipment consisting of telecommunication devices and the air interface of the mobile network. It is referred to as the BS in 3G networks, the eNB in the LTE standard, and the GNodeB for the 5G. Any wireless service provider operates a country-wide System of BTS. The System is the part of the wireless network responsible for the reception and transmission of radio signals from user equipments (UE), like mobile phones and computers with wireless internet wireless connectivity. All BTSs need to be electrically powered and system management may investigate methods to reduce power consumption. However, saving power may turn into a waste of performance (increased response time), in other words, into a waste of the BTS quality of service (QoS) This paper aim is to discuss the power management of BTS stations for the best compromise between energy-saving and response to incoming calls. The BTS management strategies that optimize the BTS power consumption (minimum absorbed Watt), the BTS performance (minimum response_time to incoming calls), and the BTS performance x Watt (minimum response_time x Watt) are identified. To compensate for the difficulties of using analytical approaches the paper uses simulation to evaluate the strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNetwork and Communication TechnologiesSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207