Equilibrium properties and crystal growth of <scp> D <sub>2</sub> O </scp> + cyclopentane hydrate for sustainable tritium separation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study reports thermodynamic properties and crystal growth observations of D 2 O + cyclopentane hydrate toward the development of a hydrate‐based tritium separation process. We employed D 2 O as a host of hydrate with respect to the investigation into the formation of D 2 O hydrate substrate, which is a core component of the tritium separation process. The hydrate phase equilibrium temperature in the liquid D 2 O + liquid cyclopentane system was 3.2°C higher than the corresponding H 2 O hydrate. Experiments on crystal growth were conducted at temperatures ranging from 5.1 to 8.5°C under atmospheric pressure. Under each thermodynamic condition, polygonal hydrate crystals appeared, growing along the D 2 O/cyclopentane interface. The geometric shape and size of the crystals varied depending on the temperature. The variation in crystal morphology was comparable to that of the H 2 O + cyclopentane hydrate. Implications based on the obtained results for the hydrate‐based isotopic water separation process design are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".