MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Leptons lurking in semi-visible jets at the LHC

2022· preprint· en· W4281729436 on OpenAlexaff
Cesare Cazzaniga, A. De Cosa

Bibliographic record

VenueThe European Physical Journal C · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
FundersSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsParticle physicsLarge Hadron ColliderLeptonDark matterStandard Model (mathematical formulation)Physics beyond the Standard ModelQuarkHadronSupersymmetrySignature (topology)Missing energyNuclear physicsGauge (firearms)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This Letter proposes a new search for confining dark sectors at the Large Hadron Collider. As a result of the strong dynamics in the hidden sector, dark matter could manifest in proton-proton collisions at the Large Hadron Collider in form of hadronic jets containing stable invisible bound states. These semi-visible jets have been studied theoretically and experimentally in the fully hadronic signature where the unstable composite dark matter can only decay promptly back to Standard Model quarks. We present a simplified model based on two messenger fields separated by a large mass gap allowing dark bound states to decay into pairs of oppositely charged leptons. The resulting experimental signature is characterized by non-isolated lepton pairs inside semi-visible jets. We propose a search strategy independent from the underlying model assumptions targeting this new signature, and discuss the orthogonality with respect to the existing searches. Remaining agnostic on the shape of the di-lepton spectrum, we determine the sensitivity of a dedicated analysis to the target signal. The proposed search can claim the $$3 \sigma $$ 3 σ evidence (exclusion) of the heavier mediator up to masses of 3.5 TeV (4.5 TeV) with the full Run 2 data of the LHC. Exploiting the resonant feature of the lepton pairs can enhance the sensitivity reach on a specific model. We estimate that an analysis using the di-lepton invariant mass information can reach $$5 \sigma $$ 5 σ discovery up to masses of 3.5 TeV and improve the exclusion up to more than 5 TeV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe European Physical Journal CSame topicDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207