MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281746498 · doi:10.1177/01436244221097827

A holistic sequential fault detection and diagnostics framework for multiple zone variable air volume air handling unit systems

2022· article· en· W4281746498 on OpenAlexafffund
Narges Torabi, William O’Brien, Ricardo Moromisato

Bibliographic record

VenueBuilding Services Engineering Research and Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFault detection and isolationVariable air volumeFalse positive paradoxReal-time computingFalse positives and false negativesReliability engineeringFault (geology)EngineeringComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceActuatorAirflow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A holistic fault detection and diagnostics (FDD) method should explicitly consider the dependencies between faults at the system- and zone-level to isolate the root cause. A system-level fault can trigger false alarms at the zone-level, while concealing the presence of a zone-level fault. However, most FDD methods have focused on a single component/equipment without considering the importance of the interactions between zone- and system-level devices. This paper proposes a holistic hierarchical framework for FDD, combining the process of detection and diagnosis of controls hardware and sequencing logic faults affecting the actuators at the system- and zone-level. The proposed framework follows a holistic sequential procedure to diagnose faults and suppress false alarms in this order: hard faults in air handling units (AHUs), hard faults in variable air volume (VAV) zones, sequencing logic faults in AHUs, and sequencing logic faults in VAV zones. The detection of faults is performed by visualizing the discrepancies between the expected and measured operational behaviour of AHUs and VAV boxes. Examples demonstrating the framework are provided with data from 10 different VAV AHU systems. Practical application: This paper provides a sequential hierarchical FDD framework to address two main issues in VAV AHU systems: detectability and significance. Regarding detectability, the framework prioritizes hard faults over sequencing logic faults to avoid false positives and false negatives; about significance, system-level faults are prioritized over zone-level faults to triage high-impact faults in the system. The detection of faults is performed via visualizing the biases from the expected behaviour of AHU and VAV characteristics to provide an envisioning interpretation for the experts in facilities management in commercial buildings to find the root cause of the fault and fix them on-site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBuilding Services Engineering Research and TechnologySame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207