MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4281746720 · doi:10.1002/cac2.12314

Cancer diagnosis is one quarter lower than the expected cancer incidence in the first year of COVID‐19 pandemic in Germany: A retrospective register‐based cohort study

2022· letter· en· W4281746720 on OpenAlexaffabout
Johannes Diers, Laura Acar, Johanna Wagner, Philip Baum, Mohammed K. Hankir, Sven Flemming, Carolin Kastner, Christoph‐Thomas Germer, Helmut L’Hoest, Ursula Marschall, Johan Friso Lock, Armin Wiegering

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Communications · 2022
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Canadian institutionsCanadian Association of University Research Administrators
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PandemicRetrospective cohort studyIncidence (geometry)Quarter (Canadian coin)CancerMedicine2019-20 coronavirus outbreakCohortSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Register (sociolinguistics)Cancer incidenceInternal medicineVirologyDiseaseHistoryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cancer diagnosis is one quarter lower than the expected cancer incidence in the first year of COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: A retrospective register-based cohort studyDear Editor,The coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has necessitated that semi-urgent and elective medical cases, including cancer screenings, are postponed in hospitals worldwide to accommodate the increasing number of patients with severe COVID-19 symptoms [1-4].Consequently, several reports from the first COVID-19 wave in spring 2020 showed a significant decrease in new cancer diagnoses as well as cancer therapy and screenings [5,6].We aimed to investigate this further by performing a novel registry-based analysis of insurance claim data from BARMER, Germany's second largest health insurance provider.Detailed descriptions of the study can be found in the Supplementary Materials and Methods.A total of 33,810,604 person-years were analyzed.This included a reference period from January 2017 to December 2019 covering 25,614,919 person-years and the first year of COVID-19 from April 2020 to March 2021, covering 8,195,685 person-years.One hundred sixty-one thousand and fifty individual patients with newly encoded malignant diagnoses (ICD-GM codes: C00-C26, C30-41, C43-58, C60-97) or benign neoplasms (ICD-GM codes: D00-48) were identified (Supplementary Table S1).The median age was 66 years, and 58.6% were female.At the time of data analysis, there were 696 patients with incomplete information (0.4% of all cases).These cases were not considered.The overall incidence of benign and malignant neoplasms encoded by ICD C00 to D48 decreased by 23.06% (-11.63[95%CI:-11.13 to -12.14] per 10,000 insurance holders [IH]; P < 0.001).The most prominent decrease in benign and malignant neoplasms was in the age group 18-49 years with 26.98% (95%CI: -5.69[-5.15 to -6.23] per 10,000 IH; P <

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.152
GPT teacher head0.437
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Communications→Same topicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts→French-language works237,207→