DEEP LEARNING-BASED METHOD TO EXTEND THE TIME SERIES OF GLOBAL ANNUAL VIIRS-LIKE NIGHTTIME LIGHT DATA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. The nighttime light (NTL) remote sensed imagery has been applied in monitoring human activities from many perspectives. As the two most widely used NTL satellites, the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) Operational Linescan System and the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (NPP)-Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) have different spatial and radiometric resolutions. Thus, some long-time series analysis cannot be conducted without effective and accurate cross-calibration of these two datasets. In this study, we proposed a deep-learning based model to simulate VIIRS-liked DMSP NTL data by integrating the enhanced vegetation index (EVI) data product from MODIS. By evaluating the spatial pattern of the results, the modified Self-Supervised Sparse-to-Dense networks delivered satisfying results of spatial resolution downscaling. The quantitative analysing of the simulated VIIRS-liked DMSP NTL with original VIIRS NTL showed a good consistency at the pixel level of four selected sub datasets with R2 ranging from 0.64 to 0.76, and RMSE ranging from 3.96-9.55. Our method presents that the deep learning model can learn from relatively raw data instead of fine processed data based on expert knowledge to cross-sensor calibration and simulation NTL data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".