EXPLORING QUANTUM COMPUTING POTENTIALS IN SOLVING A COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE TO COVID-19 DURING A CITY JOURNEY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. COVID-19 is an airborne virus that can be spread directly or indirectly from one person to another. Spreading the virus strongly depends on the location and time and hence, a Spatio-temporal event. Moreover, traffic congestion will increase the spread of the virus not only because of the vicinity but also because of increased temperature and humidity in these spaces for a short or long time. This paper introduces a vehicle routing optimization model to reduce COVID-19 exposure risk during a city journey by solving it as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problem on a quantum annealing computer. Indeed, the objective of the COVID-19 prevention optimization problem is to minimize the risk of exposure for a given set of road users between origins and destinations. Microsoft Taxi data from the city of Beijing have been used to simulate road users’ movement. The problem has been run onto three different solvers. One of the solvers is executed on classical computers, and two other solvers are executed on hybrid quantum solvers. Hybrid solvers return the solution within less than 0.03 seconds on quantum processing unit time. However, the results will be returned at least 5 seconds after the execution in the classical solver. It is worth mentioning that, as there is no direct access to the quantum computers, it is hard to compare the results on the same scale as the queries will go on a queue in D-wave quantum computers. Applying the proposed model on the trajectory data shows a better distribution of the vehicles on the road network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".