MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281754944 · doi:10.1117/12.2618832

Convolutional neural networks and wavelets for drone classification

2022· article· en· W4281754944 on OpenAlexaff
Emily Hunter, Divy Raval, Bhashyam Balaji, Anthony Damini

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced SAR Imaging Techniques
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDroneArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkRadarComputer scienceWaveletPattern recognition (psychology)Discrete wavelet transformWavelet transformFeature extractionComputer visionTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over recent years, drone identification and detection has become an increasing concern for public safety and security. In this paper, we explore the use of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) applied to the continuous and discrete wavelet transform (CWT/DWT) scalogram of reflected radar signals from drones. In particular, we use the Martin-Mulgrew model to simulate the radar signals reflected off of five different types of drones from an X-band and W-band radar. The drones have different blade lengths and blade rotation rates, and these parameters will affect their respective scalograms, allowing for the use of CNNs in this classification problem. Results with real radar data sets collected in the laboratory are also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced SAR Imaging TechniquesFrench-language works237,207