The chemical process monitoring method based on temporal extended orthogonal neighbourhood preserving embedding ( <scp>TONPE</scp> )
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Due to the high dimensionality, non‐linearity and dynamic characteristics of chemical process data, a fault monitoring method based on temporal extension orthogonal neighbourhood preserving embedding (TONPE) is proposed. In order to make up for the shortcomings of the orthogonal neighbourhood preserving embedding (ONPE) algorithm, an information extraction strategy based on spatio‐temporal structure is developed. First, a local neighbourhood set with spatio‐temporal characteristics is established, and a weight matrix with spatio‐temporal is reconstructed for each time point through the nearest neighbour in space and time. Then, a projection matrix with orthogonal constraints is obtained to establish a monitoring model. The TONPE algorithm can fully capture the local dynamic changes of high‐dimensional data by extracting two different manifold features, so that the low‐dimensional space has better performance capabilities. The simulation results of the continuous stirred tank reactor process and the Tennessee Eastman process verify the effectiveness of the TONPE algorithm in chemical process monitoring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".