MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281779263 · doi:10.1002/ese3.1214

Mining‐induced failure characteristics and surrounding rock control of gob‐side entry driving adjacent to filling working face in the deep coal mine

2022· article· en· W4281779263 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Science & Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCoalCoal miningMining engineeringGeologyPillarFace (sociological concept)Geotechnical engineeringRoofStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper studies the width of narrow coal pillars, mining‐induced failure characteristics, and surrounding rock control effect of gob‐side entry driving (GED) adjacent to 2‐1208 filling working face with an approximately 900 m depth. Laboratory experiments, numerical simulations, loosening circle tests, and engineering practices are conducted. The mechanical properties of the filling body, the distribution and evolution law of the second invariant deviatoric stress ( J 2 ), and the variation in the plastic zone of the surrounding rock in GED are studied. The conditions of various coal pillar widths and the gob backfilled or not of the adjacent working face are also considered. The results of roadway driving along the filling working face in the deep coal mine are that: (1) The evolution law of J 2 and the plastic zone features of the surrounding rock in GED have changed significantly. Thus, it is unreasonable to still adopt the customary theory of narrow coal pillar determination and roadway support design method of GED adjacent to nonfilling working face. (2) The plastic zone of GED has typically asymmetric distribution characteristics during driving and retreating, which is mainly concentrated at the upper corner of the virgin coal rib. And the elastic zone changes slightly by the influence of mining‐induced pressure on the working face, indicating that support in this area is easier. (3) During the stable period of roadway driving, there includes a “ring‐shaped” J 2 depression zone at the upper corner of the coal pillar rib. While the peak zone distribution of J 2 in the virgin coal rib of GED is approximately “crescent‐shaped,” and the peak zone is inclined to the upper corner of the virgin coal rib, which implies that this area is a crucial control region. (4) During the retreating period of panel 2‐1210, the direction of the maximum principal stress of GED gradually deflects from the direction of the gob to that perpendicular to the roof and floor, which represents that the key support area of GED has changed. Therefore, the advanced support of GED needs to be reinforced by single hydraulic props. The width of the coal pillar was determined to be 5 m, and a targeted truss anchor cable support method with bidirectional resistance function is proposed for the roof and both ribs, which realized the stability control of GED during deep filling mining.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score0.899

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it