Adoption of ICRU report 90 recommendations in the Canadian Co-60 air-kerma primary standard
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Canadian air-kerma primary standard for 60 Co beams is updated according to ICRU report 90 (ICRU-90) recommendations. The effect of these recommendations and a more detailed chamber model on the primary standard is investigated. Dosimetric quantities and corrections required for the realization of air kerma are calculated using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo (MC) simulation system. The validity of Spencer–Attix (SA) cavity theory as function of Δ, the secondary particle production threshold energy, is investigated to assess the accuracy of its current selection criterion. Although individual changes in some correction factors are statistically non-negligible, the overall effect amounts to only a 0.04% increase of the standard. The mean restricted mass electronic stopping power ratio graphite to air, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math> decreases from the previous value of 1.0010 to a value of 0.9949. If this value is used with the recommended W air value of 33.97 eV, the effect on the standard is a reduction of 0.613%. When the recommended <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>air</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>g,</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="thinmathspace"/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math> value of 33.72 eV is used instead, the change results in a 0.835% reduction in K air . Using SA cavity theory to obtain K air with a Δ value of 20 keV, corresponding to the cavity’s mean chord length, reproduces a direct MC calculation at the 0.03% level. Type B uncertainties due to uncertainty in the photon and electron cross sections for the largest corrections K wall and K comp are estimated to be 0.01% and 0.10%, respectively. No statistically significant effect on the standard is observed due to changes in the correction factors. Fano tests and comparison to single scattering calculations demonstrate EGSnrc’s electron transport algorithm accuracy to be within 0.03% relative to its own cross sections. The latter also validates the criterion for selecting Δ based on the average chord length of the chamber’s cavity. A 0.2% difference in the restricted stopping power ratio obtained in this work and the value resulting from ICRU-90 recommendations has the potential for affecting standards relying on the absolute value of W air , thus further investigation is granted. The current update results in a 0.8% decrease of the Canadian 60 Co air-kerma primary standard with a reduced uncertainty of 0.2%. This change is in excellent agreement with the reported change to the BIPM 60 Co air-kerma standard.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".