Study of Durable Strength of Steel Mining and Metallurgical Equipment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Erosion of the metal of mining and metallurgical equipment due to the impact of solid particles is one of the forms of wear that can significantly limit the service life of a working machine or technological equipment, for example, a pipeline conveyor, loading and unloading bodies of mine workings and metallurgical machines. At present, this problem has been little studied and there is not enough information in the literature to form a systematic picture of impact erosion of equipment elements of mining and processing plants. The purpose of the research was to study the fatigue strength and corrosion-mechanical crack resistance of some structural elements of mining and metallurgical equipment with a long service life in chemically aggressive environments. Experimental tests for corrosion fatigue (long-term strength) were performed under bending load. The tests were performed on a bend with zero average voltage and a cycle frequency of 30 Hz. The tests were performed in salt solutions with a concentration of NaCl 5%. To compare the results, tests were sometimes performed in the air. The given data analysis shows that the long-term fatigue of the metal of mining and metallurgical equipment is significantly reduced when reaching 20 years of operation, especially in an aggressive environment containing chlorine ions, which causes severe corrosion damage to steel equipment. In addition, samples cut from metal with a long service life in mining and metallurgical conditions (more than 20 years) are characterized by low long-term strength. It has been found that fatigue resistance decreases with an increase in the number of cycles. Steel samples tested based on N = 106 and especially on the basis of N = 107 cycles have low resistance, which inevitably leads to breakdown with the subsequent destruction of equipment. It has been established that with an increase in the service life of the experimental mining and metallurgical equipment, the fracture toughness of the metal decreases significantly, which causes further failure and destruction of technological equipment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".