Energy Efficiency Improvement of Diesel–Electric Trains Using Solar Energy: A Feasibility Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nowadays, productivity challenges in modern manufacturing systems have been the driving force in generating energy-efficient technologies in every industry, including diesel–electric locomotives. The diesel–electric locomotive is one of the most widely used methods in rail transportation, especially in North America. More precisely, the evolution of the electric transmission has allowed the locomotive’s effective tractive effort to increase its diesel engine horsepower. In this paper, we study a new way to improve the energy efficiency of diesel–electric trains using photovoltaic solar panels. This solution is suitable for reducing greenhouse gas emissions of the diesel–electric locomotive system, particularly in cold climates. We explore the amount of energy produced by the PV solar panels and compare it with that produced by the auxiliary diesel-generator during a train’s journey. This comparison clarifies the actual percentage of energy that solar panels can cover. Thus, this paper presents a validation of feasibility and profitability as a function of the train’s specific operating conditions and the meteorological data associated with their routes. Based on the results, the minimum annual fuel reduction of auxiliary generators allowed using PV solar panels is above 50% in all cases and wagon classes, proving this solution’s feasibility. Regarding the comparison, case 3 (Sept-Îles to Schefferville) and case 4 (Luxor to Aswan) are the best, with over 100% of the energy provided by PV solar panels in all the wagons’ classes. The payback period ranges from 2.5 years to 9.1 years, while the CO2 emission reduction’s revenues range from $460 to $998 per year/wagon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".