Pore-scale systematic study on the disconnection of bulk gas phase during water imbibition using visualized micromodels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
When water imbibes into tight rocks, the disconnection of bulk gas phase will significantly impact the performance of gas recovery. In this work, we have conducted a systematic micromodel study on the disconnection of gas phase during water imbibition. Seven types of micromodels were designed that can geometrically mimic basic pore structures of a tight sandstone. Then, we conducted capillary-dominant imbibition experiments and analyzed the effects of pore geometry and pore-throat ratio on the transient evolutions of gas–water interfaces. Our pore-scale results reveal that snap-off and bypassing flows are the two main mechanisms that determine disconnection and entrapment of the gas phase. Moreover, we qualitatively linked the pore-scale two-phase displacements to the core-scale “permeability jail” phenomenon (i.e., nearly immobile of non-wetting and wetting phases across a wide range of saturation values). Our study will enrich the knowledge of entrapment behaviors of the gas phase during water imbibition into tight formations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".