MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281803779 · doi:10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100496

Plasma Kidney Injury Molecule-1 in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Discordance Between ELISA and Proximity Extension Assay

2022· article· en· W4281803779 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Insa M. Schmidt, Mia R. Colona, Anand Srivastava, Guanghao Yu, Venkata Sabbisetti, Joseph V. Bonventre, Sushrut S. Waikar

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesMedical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthHorizon TherapeuticsGlaxoSmithKlineDairy Farmers of CanadaNorthwestern UniversityAstraZenecaAmerican Philosophical Society
KeywordsAptamerProteomicsBiomarkerLupus nephritisMedicineAntibodyBiomarker discoveryMolecular biologyImmunoassayComputational biologyBioinformaticsInternal medicineImmunologyBiologyDiseaseBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oligonucleotide-labeled antibodies (Olink, Olink Proteomics) and aptamers (SomaScan, SomaLogic) are increasingly used in biomarker discovery and research. However, few studies have compared the protein levels measured on proteomics platforms with those measured using conventional immunoaffinity assays.1-5 This may be especially relevant in the setting of autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), where anti–double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies could interfere with immunoassay technologies that use oligonucleotide-based antibodies (Olink) or aptamers (SomaScan).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKidney MedicineSame topicCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchFrench-language works237,207